Introduction
Proximal humerus fractures, accounting for approximately 5% of all fractures, pose a significant challenge in orthopedic management due to their complex anatomy and diverse fracture patterns.1 Treatment of Proximal humerus fracture does not have major complications but it leads to loss of working hours for months and temporary disability. In such cases it becomes important to restore the function of the limb. Treatment of this injury is purely depended on the severity of fracture & classification. Whether to choose non-operative treatment or go with surgical procedure can be debatable as there are many studies favouring the both modalities.
Treatment options range from conservative management like collar and cuff sling to various surgical interventions, each with its pros and cons. Surgical options include closed percutaneous fixation with k-wires to open reduction & internal fixation with various available implants ranging from k-wires, intramedullary nails to plate. We conducted this study at our institute and its main purpose was to compare functional outcome of two modalities as treatment of proximal humerus fracturethat includes Philos plating and percutaneous k-wire fixation with or without external clamps.
PHILOS plating, which stands for proximal humerus internal locking osteosynthesis plate is an invasive technique, that utilizes a locking plate system to achieve anatomical reduction and stable fixation of the fracture fragments.2 This method most commonly utilizes the Deltopectoral approach for fracture exposure & fixation. This approach offers potential benefits like improved biomechanical stability, early mobilization, and potentially better functional outcomes.3 However, concerns exist regarding soft tissue damage, neurovascular damage, risk of infection, implant prominence, soft tissue irritation, and potential hardware complications. 4
Percutaneous k-wire fixation with or without external clamps, on the other hand, involves inserting thin Kirschner wires (k-wires) across the fracture site. Securing these k wires externally with clamps provides better stability to the construct and prevents varus collapse. This minimally invasive method offers advantages like less surgical dissection, shorter operative time, less morbid and potentially lower cost. 5 However, concerns include the potential for k-wire migration, loss of fixation, and limitations in achieving optimal fracture reduction, particularly in complex fracture patterns. 6
Therefore, a comparative study investigating Philos plating versus percutaneous k- wire fixation with external clamps for proximal humerus fractures is crucial to evaluate their efficacy and safety, ultimately guiding optimal treatment decisions. This study aims to address this need by Evaluating functional outcomes using validated scoring systems like the Constant-Murley score. By analyzing these key parameters, this study will contribute valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of Philos plating and percutaneous k-wire fixation with external clamps, potentially informing treatment strategies for proximal humerus fractures.
Materials and Methods
This is a randomized prospective study. This study was conducted at a Tertiary care hospital. This study includes patients coming to the Orthopaedics outpatient department or casualty department of the tertiary care hospital.
Exclusion criteria
Open fractures.
Old or Pathological fractures.
Severe comorbidities/unfit for surgical treatment.
Patients who were not willing to give written consent.
All patients with Proximal humerus fracture fulfilling the selection criteria were taken from December 2022 to November 2023. A total of 18 patients were included in the study. Upon enrollment in the study random sampling was done. The study was conducted over a duration of 1 year.
This study aims to “Evaluate the comparative effectiveness of philos plating and percutaneous k-wire fixation with external clamps for proximal humerus fractures and the objective of the study was to assess the functional outcomes of two surgical treatment methods (K-wire application and PHILOS plate fixation) for proximal humerus fractures.
Methodology
Patient selection and enrollment
Upon arrival at the emergency department, patients with suspected shoulder injuries underwent a thorough clinical evaluation. Those with suspected proximal humerus fractures were identified for further investigation with shoulder X-rays – Anteroposterior view & Axillary Lateral view. After radiological confirmation CT scan of the involved shoulder can be performed if needed. An appropriate shoulder immobilizer was applied & further planning for intervention started.
Randomization
To ensure unbiased group allocation, a consecutive enrolment process was implemented. The first eligible patient was assigned to Group A, the second to Group B, and so on, alternating between groups until the target sample size of patients was reached.
Preoperative evaluation
Following selection, all patients underwent a comprehensive preoperative workup including blood tests, chest X-ray, and electrocardiogram (ECG) to assess their fitness for surgery.
Surgical intervention
Group A received open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using a PHILOS plate. Group B underwent closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF) with percutaneous k-wire fixation with external clamping.
Surgical techniques
Open reduction & internal fixation group involves patient in a supine position. Followed by selective regional anesthesia or general anesthesia, exposure using a deltopectoral approach fracture is reduced first followed by definitive fixation with the plate internally. Whereas in second group patients, the same supine position & regional anesthesia is given. Percutaneously fracture reduced then multiple k-wires were inserted to aid fixation. Following that external clamps were applied to the ends of k-wires to avoid varus collapse of fracture.
Outcome measures
Patients were followed up routinely on 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. On each follow-up, patients were evaluated clinically using the Constant-Murley Score to assess their functional recovery. Additionally, serial X-rays were obtained to monitor fracture union throughout the healing process.
Data analysis
The data will be entered into Microsoft Excel Worksheet. The categorical data will be expressed as rates, ratios, and proportions and the continuous data will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Graphical representations will be done wherever applicable. The comparison of the two groups will be done using an unpaired t-test. P ≤ 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval will be considered as statistically significant.
Ethical consideration
The study will be conducted after obtaining permission from the Institutional Ethics Committee and the Department of orthopaedics.
Results
The following observations were made from the data collected during this study of the functional outcome following fixation using Philos plating and percutaneous k-wire fixation with external clamps for proximal humerus fractures. A total number of 18 patients were taken up for study. Out of which, 9 patients were treated with the ORIF with PHILOS plating and 9 patients with percutaneous K-wire fixation with or without external clamps. At the final follow-up, the mean Constant- Murley score (CMS) was 81+/- 6.13 for the PHILOS plating group and 76.88 +/- 7.37 for the K-wire treated group which was not found statistically significant. The results for CMS were excellent in 22.3% of patients and good in 66.7% of patients, for PHILOS treated group and excellent for 11.11%, good for 66.67% and satisfactory for 22.2% in K-wire treated group.
The following observations were made from the collected data-
In PHILOS treated group, 1 patient was in 18-40 years of age group, 5 patients were in 41-60 age group and 3 patients were more than 60 years.
Similarly, in K-wire treated group 2 patients were in 18-40 years of age, 4 patients were in 41 – 60 age and 3 patients were more than 60 years.(Figure 1)
Gender wise distribution showed that in PHILOS group there were 5 males and 4 females and in the K-wire group, there were 6 males and 3 females.(Figure 2)
The results for CMS were excellent in 22.2% of patients, good in 66.7% and satisfactory in 11.1% patients, for PHILOS treated group and excellent for 11.1%, good for 66.7% and satisfactory for 22.2% in K-wire treated group. (Figure 3)
At 6 month follow-up, the mean Constant-Murley score (CMS) was 82.77 +/-6.13 for the PHILOS plating group and 76.88 +/- 7.37 for the K-wire treated group which was not found significant statistically.(Figure 4)
Case No-1 : ORIF with Plating (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9)
Case No. 2 : CRIF with percutaneous K-wires & external clamps (Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13)
Discussion
Various studies had reported varying results. Gangaiah M et al 7 (2020) concluded that PHILOS plate provides an excellent stable construct even in multi fragmented osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures with the advantages of accurate reduction and early mobilization. Fixation with percutaneous K - wires may present an efficient treatment option for neer 2 or 3 part proximal humerus fractures with its advantages of minimal invasiveness and less soft tissue dissection. Better functional results were seen in patients treated with PHILOS plate than those treated with percutaneous K - wire fixation. He got Excellent (20 %), Very good (45 %), Good (25 %), Fair (10%) outcomes in PHILOS Plate (Group A). Whereas Excellent (10%), Very good (50 %), Good (35%), Fair (5%) outcomes in K wiring (Group B). 7
Singla TK et al (2022) 8 in their study of the Functional outcome of percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation of proximal humerus fractures, found that after 6 months of follow-up, CM score was in the range of 46-91. About 65% of the patients (n=11) had a Good functional outcome, only 2 had Excellent results and the rest of them had Fair results. The more severe the fracture as per Neer’s and AO/OTA classification, the lower the total scores observed at final follow-up. None of the patients had Poor functional outcome as per CM score. 8
Rizwan Shahid 9 et al. found similar results, although functional outcomes were better in younger patients and worse with associated dislocations.9 Thyagarajan et al. reported an average Constant score of 57.5 in their study of 30 patients with Neer's 2-part, 3-part, and 4-part fractures (average age 58 years).10 Kettler et al. observed Constant-Murley scores ranging from 52 to 72 points after PHILOS plate surgery. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Our study achieved a mean Constant Murley score of 82.77 +/-6.13 at the end of 6 months for PHILOS Group. This score compares favorably with other studies on PHILOS plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures. Whereas score was 76.88 +/- 7.37 for the K-wire treated group.
Conclusions
This study compared the functional outcomes of two methods for fixing proximal humerus fractures: Philos plating and percutaneous k-wire fixation with external clamps. Although the difference was not statistically significant, both groups achieved satisfactory functional outcomes with CM Score at the final follow-up at 6 months. Both techniques achieved favourable outcomes, with a majority of patients in both groups (88.9% for PHILOS and 77.8% for K-wire) achieving good or excellent results based on the CMS score. No study promises superiority over others for proximal humerus fracture. Further study with a larger sample size might be necessary to determine if one method offers a clear advantage over the other.
