• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 01-11-2022

Accepted : 09-01-2022



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 583

PDF Downloaded: 206


Get Permission Agrawal: Uncemented total hip replacement with impaction bone grafting in protrusio acetabuli


Introduction

Protrusio acetabuli is a central acetabular defect resulting from migration of femoral head medial to Kohler’s line.1 This results in medialization of the center of rotation (COR) of the hip. Primary Total Hip Replacement (THR) in such situations can be technically demanding due to associated significant medial and proximal migration of the center of the joint, deficient bone medially2 and reduced bony support to the acetabular component peripherally.

Figure 1
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage1.png

Cemented total hip arthroplasty resulted in promoting bone lysis and implant loosening, however, uncemented total hip arthroplasty with impacted morselized autograft with a porous coated cementless acetabular component provided a biological solution to bone deficiency and long-term fixation in arthritic hips with protrusio. 3, 4

Functional outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty was evaluated by Harris hip score pre & post operatively in the cases. 5, 6

Classification

Sotelo-Garza and charnley classification 5

Figure 2
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage2.png

The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of using impacted morselized autograft with a porous coated cementless cup in cases of protrusio acetabuli hip joint. 7, 8

Materials and Methods

  1. This is an Observational study conducted at R.D. Gardi Medical College and associated CRGH, Ujjain (M.P.), between period August 2019 to July 2021 on a total of 20 cases who are fulfilling the Inclusion criteria.

  2. All the patients included in the study were functionally evaluated by Harris hip score pre operatively along with an X-Ray of pelvis with both hips.

  3. Surgery was performed with the patient in the lateral position.

  4. All the patients were operated with uncemented total hip replacement by a standard posterior (Southern Moore) approach.

  5. Same type of implant was used in all the patients.

  6. Dislocation of hip was challenging due to deepened acetabulum and medial displacement of the femoral head. It was facilitated by an extensive capsulotomy, along with simultaneous and sustained gentle traction and rotation.

  7. Removal of posterior osteophytes before dislocation also helped.

  8. Adductor tenotomy performed in cases with excessive adductor tightness.

  9. In cases of difficult dislocation, femoral neck was resected in situ and the femoral head was excised piecemeal.

  10. Normally, before neck osteotomy, dislocated femoral head was cut into slices with a power saw.

  11. The bone slices were then morselized into 8mm-10mm sized pieces using a bone cutter.

  12. After neck osteotomy, acetabular floor prepared while avoiding penetration of a soft, deficient medial wall until a bleeding bony surface was obtained.

  13. Acetabular periphery reamed using large sized reamers initially.

  14. The morselized graft was then introduced into the prepared acetabulum and impacted against the floor using hemispherical impactors.

  15. Reverse direction reaming was done to further impact and set the graft in the floor of acetabulum.

  16. An acetabular cup trial was inserted to ensure good peripheral fit and more than 50% contact with the host bone.

  17. Finally, the chosen acetabular component was impacted into place.

Figure 3

Bone slice

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage3.png

Figure 4

Morsellised autograft

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage4.png

Post-operative protocol

  1. Post operative AP X-Ray view of the operated hip obtained.

  2. Abduction pillow used during the sleeping time for 7-10 days post-operatively.

  3. Active and active assisted range of motion exercises started within the first 24-48 hrs.

  4. Partial weight bearing with a walker was advised upto 3 months until bone grafts appeared to be incorporated in xray.

  5. Full weight bearing started at 3 months.

Follow up protocol

  1. Patients were advised not to squat, not to sit crossed legged and not cross the leg across midline.

  2. Patients were called upon at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow ups.

  3. At each visit functional outcome was taken according to Harris Hip score along with an X-ray pelvis with both hips.

Results

  1. Maximum patients (10) were in the age group of 50-60 years.

  2. With a female predominance of 8 patients (53%), and 7 male patients (47%).

  3. 10 patients had unilateral involvement whereas 5 patients had bilateral involvement.

  4. The most common etiology was found to be Rheumatoid Arthritis (10) followed by Idiopathic (7) followed by Ankylosing Spondylitis (3).

  5. 4 had mild, 7 had moderate and 9 had severe grades of protrusio.

  6. The operation time ranged from 60 to 120 minutes (mean= 79.4 ±14 mins).

  7. The blood loss ranged from 200-400 ml (mean=262±36 ml).

  8. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 48 which improved to 90 at the latest follow-up.

  9. 10 hips (50%) had excellent,8 hips (40%) had good, and 2 hips (10%) had fair results. There was no dislocation.

  10. The mean acetabular inclination angle was 44.2° (range 39°-47°).

  11. The distance from the femoral head center to Kohler’s line improved from 17.98 preoperatively to 20.36 post operatively).

Table 1

Harris hip score

S.No.

Pre-Op

6 weeks

03 Months

06 Months

01 Year

1

48.4472

68.0364

76.2004

84.6428

90.0852

Case – 1

Figure 5

PRE-OP

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage5.png
Figure 6

Immediate post op Rt. Side

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage6.png
Figure 7

Immediate post op Lt.side

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage7.png
Figure 8

1 year post op

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage8.png
Figure 9

1 year follow up

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage9.png

Case 2

Figure 10

Pre-op

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage10.png
Figure 11

Immediate post op

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage11.png
Figure 12

1 Year follow up clinical image

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage12.png

Case 3

Figure 13

PRE-OP

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage13.png
Figure 14

Immediate post-op

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage14.png
Figure 15

6 Months Follow Up

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage15.png
Figure 16

1 Year follow up clinical image

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/49396062-41d3-4394-8e8b-7c3ed33beecbimage16.png

Discussion

Study by Mullaji et al suggested that the use of impacted morselized autograft in conjunction with porous coated cementless acetabular component restored hip biomechanics after an intermediate duration follow up. 30 primary THR’s were conducted with a 4.2 year follow up which showed excellent outcome in 90% patients, fair in 7% patients and poor in 3% patients. 9 Study by Atanu et al showed that using only cement for acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli has had unacceptably high rates of recurrence, with components migrating into the acetabulum and occurrence of thermal necrosis of the thinned out medial wall due to heat polymerization of the cement. 10 These were some of the factors responsible for poor outcome.

Table 2

Comparison of results of different techniques used to treatacetabular protrusio with primary THR in literature published since 2000

Studied

No. of Hips

Mean age at surgery (Years)

Techmique

Survival of acetabular component

Mullaji et al 9

30

46

Impacted morselissed bone graft with cement less cup

100% at 4.2 years

Garcia Cimbrelo et al. 11

148

54

Cemented polyethylene component

79% at 16 Years

Perwira et al 12

23

62

Impacted morselissed bone graft with cementless component

100% at 7.8 years

Rssenberg et al 13

36

53

Impacted bone graft with cemented component

90% at 12 years

Krushell et al 14

29

66

Impacted morselissed bone graft with dual geometry cementless component

100% at 2 years

Current study

9

54

Impacted, morsellised bone graft with cementless cup

100% at 2 yeras

Conclusion

We treated 20 cases of Protrusio Acetabuli of mild, moderate and severe grades by Sotello-Garza and Charnley by uncemented total hip arthroplasty using morselized autograft. It helps in restoring biomechanics of hip joint and preventing recurrence of protrusio. We observed fair, good and excellent functional outcomes in our patients. There was no evidence of progression of protrusio or socket loosening in any of our cases. Osteolytic lesions were also not encountered by us in our study. All bone grafts united within 4-6 months after surgery and continuous trabecular bone that grew through the host bone and the bone graft was apparent. But a larger sample size and a longer follow up are required to ascertain this fact.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

MD Ries Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular protrusioOrthopedics200932910.3928/01477447-20090728-12

2 

CT Martin AD Heiner TE Baer AJ Pugely NO Noiseux Protrusio After Medial Acetabular Wall Breach in Total Hip ArthroplastyIowa Orthop J20153599107PMCID

3 

SD Gerber WH Harris Femoral head autografting to augment acetabular deficiency in patients requiring total hip replacement. A minimum five-year and an average seven-year follow-up studyJBJS198668812418

4 

P Zhen X Li S Zhou H Lu H Chen J Liu Total hip arthroplasty to treat acetabular protrusions secondary to rheumatoid arthritisJ Orthop Surg Res20181311710.1186/s13018-018-0809-y

5 

A Sotelo-Garza J Charnley The results of Charnley arthroplasty of the hip performed for protrusio acetabuliClin Orthop Relat Res1978132128

6 

D Greig PP Hsiue CJ Chen R Trikha A Khoshbin AI Stavrakis Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular ProtrusioJ Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev202047e200012110.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00121

7 

TJ Slooff R Huiskes J van Horn AJ Lemmens Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusionActa Orthop Scand1984556593610.3109/17453678408992402

8 

R E Zwartele S Witjes HC Doets T Stijnen RG Poll Cementless total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literatureArch Orthop Trauma Surg201213245354610.1007/s00402-011-1432-0

9 

AB Mullaji GM Shetty Acetabular protrusio: surgical technique of dealing with a problem in depthBone Joint J20139511 Suppl A374010.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32900

10 

A Mohanty S Parida R Biswas A Mohanty Evaluation of Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Acetabular ProtrusioInt J Contemp Med Res202075E511

11 

E Garcia-Cimbrelo A Diaz-Martin R Madero L Munuera Loosening of the cup after low-friction arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion. The importance of the position of the cupJ Bone Joint Surg Br20008211081510.1302/0301-620x.82b1.9796

12 

GC Pereira EN Kubiak B Levine FS Chen PE Di Cesare Cavitary acetabular defects treated with morselized cancellous bone graft and cementless cups Int Orthop200731444550

13 

WW Rosenberg BW Schreurs MC Malefijt RP Veth TJ Slooff Impacted morsellized bone grafting and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an 8-to 18-year follow-up study of 36 hipsActa Orthopaedica Scandinavica20007121436

14 

RJ Krushell RJ Fingeroth B Gelling Primary total hip arthroplasty using a dual-geometry cup to treat protrusio acetabuliJ Arthroplasty200823811283110.1016/j.arth.2007.09.020



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work, the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.